|
|
| Reporter | guest | Assigned To | | |
|---|
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
|---|
| Status | new | Resolution | open | |
|---|
| Platform | DUcdShNF | OS | axdDXvMEsbypR | |
|---|
|
|
| Summary | 0004828: How would you like the money? [url=http://domaine-burgaud.com/slimfast-price-comparison-vjcr]slimfast meal replacement shakes[/u |
|---|
| Description | How would you like the money? [url=http://domaine-burgaud.com/slimfast-price-comparison-vjcr]slimfast meal replacement shakes[/url] In court papers filed last week, Protectmarriage.com argued that the California federal judge's ruling did not apply statewide. It asked the California Supreme Court to immediately tell county clerks that Prop. 8 remained in effect and order them to stop issuing wedding licenses while the issue is litigated.
|
|---|
| Steps To Reproduce | How would you like the money? [url=http://domaine-burgaud.com/slimfast-price-comparison-vjcr]slimfast meal replacement shakes[/url] In court papers filed last week, Protectmarriage.com argued that the California federal judge's ruling did not apply statewide. It asked the California Supreme Court to immediately tell county clerks that Prop. 8 remained in effect and order them to stop issuing wedding licenses while the issue is litigated.
|
|---|
| Additional Information | How would you like the money? [url=http://domaine-burgaud.com/slimfast-price-comparison-vjcr]slimfast meal replacement shakes[/url] In court papers filed last week, Protectmarriage.com argued that the California federal judge's ruling did not apply statewide. It asked the California Supreme Court to immediately tell county clerks that Prop. 8 remained in effect and order them to stop issuing wedding licenses while the issue is litigated.
|
|---|
| Tags | MTbOjSZc |
|---|
| Attach Tags | |
|---|