|
|
| Reporter | guest | Assigned To | | |
|---|
| Priority | normal | Severity | minor | Reproducibility | have not tried |
|---|
| Status | new | Resolution | open | |
|---|
| Platform | hdaqdhbGIb | OS | WgQFLKBHMM | |
|---|
|
|
| Summary | 0000130: The National Gallery [url=https://www.domaine-mayoussier.com/valaciclovir-marcas-mexico-cazf]valaciclovir marcas mexico[/url] O |
|---|
| Description | The National Gallery [url=https://www.domaine-mayoussier.com/valaciclovir-marcas-mexico-cazf]valaciclovir marcas mexico[/url] Only eight justices will hear Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action because Justice Elena Kagan has been recused, presumably because she dealt with the case in her previous job as U.S. solicitor general. A 4-4 result would uphold the lower court decision and represent a victory for supporters of affirmative action, but no new precedent would be set.
|
|---|
| Steps To Reproduce | The National Gallery [url=https://www.domaine-mayoussier.com/valaciclovir-marcas-mexico-cazf]valaciclovir marcas mexico[/url] Only eight justices will hear Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action because Justice Elena Kagan has been recused, presumably because she dealt with the case in her previous job as U.S. solicitor general. A 4-4 result would uphold the lower court decision and represent a victory for supporters of affirmative action, but no new precedent would be set.
|
|---|
| Additional Information | The National Gallery [url=https://www.domaine-mayoussier.com/valaciclovir-marcas-mexico-cazf]valaciclovir marcas mexico[/url] Only eight justices will hear Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action because Justice Elena Kagan has been recused, presumably because she dealt with the case in her previous job as U.S. solicitor general. A 4-4 result would uphold the lower court decision and represent a victory for supporters of affirmative action, but no new precedent would be set.
|
|---|
| Tags | mSTiMnkszV |
|---|
| Attach Tags | |
|---|